Delta and United sued over selling “window seats” without windows

Passengers have filed lawsuits against Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, accusing the carriers of charging extra for “window seats” without actual windows. The legal actions, filed separately against both U.S. airlines, seek compensation for more than one million customers of each carrier who allegedly paid higher fares under misleading conditions.

According to the complaints, the airlines fail to disclose during the booking process that certain seats labeled as window seats are located against interior cabin walls where no windows exist. Despite the lack of a view, these seats are still sold at a premium compared to standard seats.

The lawsuits, handled by the law firm Greenbaum Olbrantz, emphasize that the disputed seats are positioned next to internal fuselage panels that house components such as air-conditioning ducts, wiring, and structural equipment. This configuration is found in common aircraft types operated by both carriers, including Boeing 737s and Airbus A320 family jets.

Cabin design creates “no-window seats”

Travelers often choose and pay extra for a window seat to reduce motion sickness, ease fear of flying, entertain children, or simply enjoy outside views during the flight. The absence of a window undermines these expectations, which plaintiffs argue amounts to “deceptive” and “unlawful” business practices.

Both Delta and United classify all seats positioned along the cabin sidewalls as window seats, even when no actual window exists. By contrast, competitors such as American Airlines and Alaska Airlines explicitly notify passengers during seat selection when a seat has no window.

The lawsuits highlight that the issue stems from the internal design of aircraft cabins. On some Boeing and Airbus models, the placement of systems and structural reinforcements prevents the installation of windows at certain seat rows. This means that, despite being positioned on the outer wall of the cabin, some seats have no external view.

For passengers paying extra to secure a window seat, this structural detail has a direct impact on the travel experience. The failure to disclose which seats lack windows has now led to significant legal challenges for Delta and United, raising questions about airline transparency in seating practices.

About the Author

Ricardo Meier

Creator of the website that started in 1996 as a magazine. He also writes on Brazilian websites AUTOO, MOTOO and MetrôCPTM.

Articles by the author »